Brief Description of the Case
In September 2022, Company A bid to participate in the product supply and installation project of Company B in a certain county. On September 14, 2022, it received the notice of winning the bid from Company B. According to the requirements of the notice of winning the bid, the subcontract needs to be signed through electronic signing. However, after Company A requested to sign the subcontract before supplying and installing, Company B did not sign the subcontract with Company A. Company B promised Company A that it would fulfill the supply and installation project as soon as possible first and then sign the subcontract later. Company A, adhering to the principle of honesty and good faith between both parties, completed the supply and installation obligations in advance. However, when it later requested Company B to pay the project funds, after paying 300,000 yuan, Company B failed to pay the remaining 500,000 yuan or so due in a timely manner.
Company A and Company B have had multiple rounds of communication on the relevant matters but still failed to reach an agreement. With no other choice, Company A turned to Beijing Rude Law Firm for professional legal support. After taking on this case, the legal team of Rude Law Firm acted promptly, leveraging their rich experience and professional expertise to carry out in-depth work in multiple dimensions. After carefully sorting out the details of the case, actively collecting all kinds of evidence, and conducting arduous negotiations and maneuvering with all parties. Ultimately, under the ruling of the Beijing Arbitration Commission, Rude Law Firm successfully assisted Company A in recovering over 400,000 yuan of the remaining project funds, effectively safeguarding Company A's legitimate rights and interests and removing obstacles for its development.
Lawyer Intervention
Liu Qiang, the representative of Beijing Haidian District Lawyers Association, the chief legal adviser of Lushang Association, the chief legal adviser of Beijing Changzhi Enterprise, the expert lawyer invited by the "How to Do" column of People's Net, has been the exclusive interview of People's Daily and Beijing Daily, and the director of Haidian District Excellent Law Firm in 2019.
Good at business: labor disputes, legal counsel, commercial arbitration, corporate business, economic disputes, contract disputes, real estate disputes, marriage and family
Service units: International Cooperation Center of National Development and Reform Commission, Chinese People's Liberation Army Academy of Military Sciences, Beijing Guancheng Xinji Real Estate Development Co., LTD., Beijing Berlin International Architectural Design Co., LTD., Beijing Zhiweixian Project Management Consulting Co., Ltd. and other more than 10 service units. Representative of Beijing Haidian District Lawyers Association, chief legal adviser of Lushang Federation, chief legal adviser of Beijing Changzhi Enterprise, invited expert lawyer of "How to do" column of People's Net, has won an exclusive interview with People's Daily and Beijing Daily, and director of Haidian District Excellent Law Firm in 2019.
Han Yi, a trainee lawyer graduated from the Law School of Dalian University, has solid legal expertise and rich work experience. He is familiar with the writing of various official documents and legal texts; has excellent expression and communication skills; has excellent judgment and logical analysis skills; is upright and law-abiding; has a wide range of hobbies, enjoys interacting with people, and does his best to provide clients with better legal services.
Case Handling Process
After conducting A comprehensive analysis of the case of Company A, Lawyer Liu Qiang and intern Lawyer Han Yi believed that Company B had committed a breach of contract and thus filed an arbitration request with the Beijing Arbitration Commission. During the court hearing, after communicating with Company A, the lawyers from Rude Law Firm presented one by one the strong evidence they had collected and sorted out, such as the completion certificates of the supply and installation projects and the payable project funds. They also put forward professional cross-examination opinions on the evidence presented by Company B in its defense in accordance with the law and the contractual agreement. Through the unremitting efforts of the lawyers of Rude Law Firm, we finally obtained the support of the arbitration tribunal for our arbitration request, which highly recognized and accepted the evidence we submitted, maximizing the legitimate benefits for the parties involved.
Lawyer reminder
During the settlement process of supply and installation projects, various conflicts and disputes may arise. In practice, similar to this case, there are many instances where the cooperative party delays or refuses to pay the project funds during the project settlement, and then deducts the project funds under the pretext of project quality issues or project schedule delays. In case of such problems, it is recommended that the company keep relevant evidence well and contact a professional lawyer in a timely manner to protect its rights on its behalf. With the help of the lawyer, the dispute can be resolved through legal channels. This move can not only maximize the company's rights and interests, but also reduce the company's time cost and avoid legal burdens.